Don't Make These 3 EXPENSIVE Church Logo Mistakes

In 2021, my wife and I moved back to our home town of Bartlesville, Oklahoma and joined the church we now call home - Hope Presbyterian Church. The church had hired a Ukrainian designer on Fiverr and got a fantastic logo design (it even won an award). But there was a problem… All they had was that logo. Their whole “brand” was limited to a gold color and a couple of webp’s. While the logo was aesthetically pleasing, it wasn’t enough to help their people “get” the mission. Each billboard, banner, and invitation card was inconsistent and time-consuming, even for the creative associate pastor. The more they tried to make their branding work in the real world, the more things got messy and out of alignment. Members with design experience were called on over and over again to come in and help “fix” designs, which always ended up being a band-aid for the real issue. What my home church went through is the result of a logo design without a true brand. They needed an easy-to-use branding toolkit with theological depth - one that would represent more than just the name of their church. A kingdom-first brand would have given their congregation ownership of the vision their leaders were casting, and would have attracted more visitors who resonated with the message they preached. And that’s why I stopped designing logos, and started developing kingdom-first brands instead.

It’s no secret that people remember images better than words. Studies show we can remember 65% of visual information after 3 days, compared to just 10% of written/spoken info. That’s a 6x increase in retention! But why does it matter for churches? Good question. Something I’ve learned is that a brand isn’t just a logo, colors, or fonts. A church brand is an opportunity to tell the story of what God has done and is doing in that local ministry. Said another way: your brand is the visual aid for people to easily remember what their church stands for, and the story God is telling there. This ties in closely to the examples we have in the Bible of when the Lord commanded that a monument be built to signify his mercy and might. In Joshua 4:1–10, God tells the Israelites to take twelve stones from the Jordan River and set them up as a memorial. This visual monument served as a lasting symbol to help future generations remember how the Lord miraculously stopped the river’s flow, allowing His people to cross on dry ground. These stones were set up intentionally as a tangible visual aid to reinforce the Israelites’ generational memory and faith. To add even more layers, God also instructs that twelve stones be used. Why twelve? To symbolize the twelve tribes who crossed over the Jordan that day. In the same way, designing an intentional brand identity with symbolism and permanence is the most powerful way to help your people remember their God-given identity as a body and look to Christ, week in and week out.

Your logo isn’t a brand, nor is the name of your church a brand. Your color palette, word mark, fonts, and church website aren’t your brand either. These things only serve to ASSOCIATE your church with the big idea that is your message. Make this association enough times with enough people, and NOW you have a brand. Think about it like this: Branding is the vehicle for your message. It’s the wrapper! The packaging won’t change the chemical make up of the burger, but it can still make the burger taste better, and turn a meal into an experience worth sharing. So, to answer the question how much branding does a church need, the answer is none. None? Right. If you don’t have that big idea clarified and nailed down, you can design the most beautiful identity system and logo in the world and not have a brand.

For those of us with book collections, there’s just something about a well designed book cover. I’m talking kind that makes you do the chefs kiss every time you see it. Maybe one even comes to mind for you. I continue to find new books with beautiful cover designs, but there was one recently that confused me until the third or fourth time I picked it up to read. The book is called Designing Brand Identity, 6th edition by Alina Wheeler and Rob Meyerson. When I first saw the cover, I didn’t give it a second thought…. After all, I had bought the book for what was inside. It wasn’t until I saw it again from far away that I realized what the design was supposed to be: a number “6” for 6th edition. It was staring me in the face! I had the epiphany when my folks happened to be over at our house, so I showed my dad the hidden number in the design. His observation was, “That seems like bad design, shouldn’t they have made it more obvious?” It’s a good question: would the design have been better if it hadn’t been so subtle? Here’s my take: For most books, the cover only has two key pieces of information it needs to convey: the title and the author. The edition is usually a secondary or tertiary piece of info, if it’s included on the cover at all. There’s another more important function of the book cover, however. That function is to be distinct and enticing. If a book cover immediately identifies a book as different from all the other books on a shelf, it has done most of its job. This bright yellow book cover with swirling shapes did that. Here’s the application to branding: The purpose of your church logo isn’t to explain who your church is. In fact, it only matters a little if it has your church name at all. The most important thing in a logo is that it identifies you as distinct from others. If it doesn’t do that, you might as well not have a logo at all.

I recently helped a church rebrand where part of the new identity was the dreaded 👻name change 👻. The church was looking to plant a new congregation in a nearby community in the coming year, and they needed a name that could be shared between them, which was ultimately decided to be “Christ Redeemer.” Starting from scratch with the visual brand, I had nothing to draw on that would be familiar to their congregation. At many points in the project it was a toss up whether the pure excitement or raw terror would win out. Would the elders like the new design? Would seeing the logo concepts make them rethink everything? Would it fall on me if the congregation didn’t like the new name? These were the questions racing through my mind on the Sunday that the church’s leaders presented their new direction to the church as a whole. The next day I got a text from the worship pastor: “We showed the logo teaser and it was received very well. Some people were even teary-eyed.” “That’s great!” I thought. I kept reading. “But… a question came in via email that I’d like your help responding to.” Oh boy… Here was the question: “Hoping to learn about the decision regarding having the c in Christ lower case. I would like to understand this.” This was something we anticipated. For context, here’s the new logo they presented: {{ comp.video({ src:"/img/christ-redeemer-logo-presentation.mp4" }) }} Ultimately, here is the response we landed on: Thank you so much for engaging thoughtfully with the new logo. I love that you’re paying attention to these details—it shows real care for how we represent Christ and our church. You asked about the choice to use lowercase in the wordmark. That decision was intentional. The phrase “Christ Redeemer” is incredibly powerful—it’s really the gospel in two words. When we explored placing it in all caps, the effect was visually overwhelming, almost like the design was shouting. That led us to reflect on the paradox of Jesus himself: he had all power, and yet he did not come in power the way the world expected. Instead, he came in humility, laying down his life for us. We wanted the wordmark to hold that tension: strong yet humble, bold yet quiet. Lowercasing "christ redeemer" became a subtle way of embodying that paradox. As followers of Jesus, we’re called to the same kind of paradoxical life—living is dying, losing is gaining. If you’re interested, here’s a short article that explains some of the design thinking behind lowercase wordmarks in general: Why Some Logos Work Better in Lowercase. We found it helpful as part of our own process. It’s also worth noting: this is specifically a wordmark design choice. Whenever the church’s name appears in documents, online profiles, or other written settings, it will still be written as Christ Redeemer. Of course, the most important thing is not typography, but that our lives together point people to Jesus. The logo is just one small way we hope to embody that spirit. My hope is that every time we see it, it quietly reminds us that true greatness is found in humility, and true power in servanthood. Thanks again for raising the question—I’m grateful for your heart and your care for how we bear Christ’s name. Grace and peace, Hopefully this helps reframe changes and new chapters as an opportunity for pastoral care, rather than a bullet to be dodged! Be strong and courageous. In another post, I’ll outline the specific strategy we used to craft this letter, with explanations of why each section is there.

Cracker Barrel’s catastrophic rebrand would have been hard to miss because of the public outrage and backlash it got (of course I picked the exactly WRONG time to take a break from writing this newsletter). But the reason their new logo caught so much viral hate has a direct application to church branding, so humor me while we explore it for a moment. Here’s my hot take: The new logo perfectly captured Cracker Barrel’s identity. Before you cancel me in the comments, let me convince you why this is the case. Think back to 6 months ago. If you had asked a thousand people what they thought about the Cracker Barrel logo, what response would you have gotten? Probably something along the lines of, “I mean… it’s fine I guess. Never really thought about it.” Most people would have been apathetic or ambivalent at best. Maybe a few design-conscious souls would have said “eh, there’s probably some room for improvement.” So, why did this particular rebrand trigger so much nationwide, seething outrage? Some news outlets blamed “conservatives who don’t like change” and others said it was about the people rebelling against modern minimalism and oversimplification. But consider an alternate timeline: Cracker Barrel hires design firm to help them update their existing brand Design firm looks at Cracker Barrel’s history, core customer base, and the values they were built on Design firm comes up with a cleaner and more modern take on the logo, keeping the country charm and home-grown heritage that it represents Cracker Barrel slowly rolls out the new brand, leading with context around the need to update and their unchanged values/identity In this scenario, I’d be surprised if anyone bats an eye. Maybe they notice that the billboards are easier to read, or that the menu design feels a bit more vibrant and fresh than it used to. No headlines! No mockery! Nothing! But here’s the thing: it wasn’t a new logo that upset people. Cracker Barrel’s customers felt betrayed by what the new logo represented. The new branding signaled a fundamental change in the identity of Cracker Barrel, from a quirky, homey spot for comfort food and checkers to a corporate sellout chain with politically correct messaging and token vegan options. In my opinion, the new (now cancelled) logo did TOO GOOD of a job representing what Cracker Barrel had become — a woke corporation like everyone else. This visual accuracy ended up being the downfall of the rebrand, to the detriment of the company’s stock prices and consumer confidence. Here’s the takeaway: Your church logo isn’t your brand. Your brand is the story, meaning, and gut feelings that people associate with you. Build your brand on the three pillars of a church brand: Christ, Congregation, and Community.

“All our digital and print stuff looks inconsistent, but I don’t know where to start fixing it.” “Our logo is good, but the rest of our branding is a mess!” Sound familiar? I’ve had more and more churches lately tell me this story. If that’s you, then the odds are you don’t need a full rebrand. Normally, I see rebrands working for churches who are in a pivotal moment - one that’s going to shape the identity of their congregation for a long time. Think about your church brand like a house. When you go for a full rebrand, it’s like you’re tearing that house down to the foundation and starting over from scratch. Sometimes this is the right call, especially when there are serious structural problems or the house doesn’t serve your needs. You’re changing a big part of the structure and framing out something new. Conversely, brand refreshes are for those who have a solid foundation and structure, but need a renovation. This is the chance for a church to fix leaks, re-do the kitchen, and get a new paint job. Sometimes all brand refresh calls for is just a set of brand guidelines with a few Canva templates. Other times it’s an intentional tweaking of the logo, and a redesign of everything else. The main idea behind the refresh is bringing that rogue branding into alignment. When you consider a refresh vs a rebrand, ask yourself, do we need a rebuild, or just a minor renovation?

If you’re looking at getting new signs or updating your building, don’t miss this opportunity to update your branding as well! It’s one thing for a sign to look nice and be functional, but branding and design has the power to do much more than just help people find the nursery. Every bulletin, banner, and coffee cup is an opportunity to shape the culture of your church through intentional, vision-aligned branding that stands the test of time. If that’s your ultimate goal, then updating your signs without rebranding first would be a massive waste of time and money! Schedule a time to talk and I’ll walk you through what a brand refresh could look like, so you don’t have to re-do your signs AGAIN in a couple of years.