We often think of form and function as a dichotomy. Sacrificing beauty for efficiency is putting function over form. Making something sleek and attractive at the cost of performance is putting form over function.
Here’s my hot take: The form-function dichotomy is wrong.
Form and function are two sides of the same coin.
The name of the coin is elegance, or more simply “goodness.”
And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. — Genesis 1:31a
We don’t assess beauty in a vacuum. If a thing doesn’t accomplish its purpose, can it be beautiful?
The Roman aqueducts were built with masterful craftsmanship and still stand to this day, 2000 years later. They transported millions of gallons of water over a hundred miles, making them extremely functional.
But would they be beautiful if they didn’t work?
If a thing’s only purpose is to be beautiful, does it matter if it can do anything else?
We often think of form and function as a dichotomy. Sacrificing beauty for efficiency is putting function over form. Making something sleek and attractive at the cost of performance is putting form over function.
Here’s my hot take: The form-function dichotomy is wrong.
Form and function are two sides of the same coin.
The name of the coin is elegance, or more simply “goodness.”
And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. — Genesis 1:31a
We don’t assess beauty in a vacuum. If a thing doesn’t accomplish its purpose, can it be beautiful?
The Roman aqueducts were built with masterful craftsmanship and still stand to this day, 2000 years later. They transported millions of gallons of water over a hundred miles, making them extremely functional.
But would they be beautiful if they didn’t work?
If a thing’s only purpose is to be beautiful, does it matter if it can do anything else?