communication

It can be hard to know if you should tease a church rebrand in advance. An all-at-once approach might seem cleaner and easier. However, if you really want a lot of buy-in from the congregation, there are real advantages to letting certain people get a little taste of the rebrand before it officially launches. I recently worked with Walnut Street Baptist Church in Louisville, KY on a total rebrand. Here’s what worship pastor Will said about their strategy (shared with permission): Before I did the big roll-out to the whole church, I did a presentation for our staff and our deacons. This allowed me to practice my spiel, but it also let two influential groups of leaders give their immediate feedback. It also created some helpful buzz, as those leaders could tell their friends that they had seen the new branding and liked it. That helpful buzz was really important. For Walnut Street, teasing or “pre-launching” their new brand was a great way to build momentum leading up to the official launch. Where else would you apply this idea of creating buzz?

In the design world, something people often forget (or don’t realize) is that a church brand has to speak to two audiences instead of one. Unlike most businesses, a church doesn’t just have “customers.” It has a congregation and a community. You can think of these as internal and external audiences. Without a balanced approach that considers both audiences, you can end up speaking to only one. Some churches only do branding inwardly with their congregation. Others only speak to their community. This reality makes it all the more important that you have a timeless brand designed to work in both contexts. Churches need a brand designed to resonate with the people they’re trying to reach (community), and the people they want to inspire (congregation). Without a healthy balance, you’re probably not reminding your community THAT you exist and your congregation WHY you exist.

I recently watched the movie Imitation Game with Benedict Cumberbatch. It chronicles the genius work of Alan Turing to crack the Enigma cypher during WWII. Germany was using encrypted messages to send critical instructions to its ships and submarines via radio. The Americans could intercept the messages, but couldn’t decode them fast enough. The Germans knew that a message is useless if it can’t be understood by its recipient. When you’re crafting your vision, mission, and brand, how often do you evaluate if it will be understood by your audience? Are you putting it in language they’re familiar with? Does your logo capture something they resonate with?

This week we did our 2024 taxes. I mixed a protein shake, opened my laptop on our kitchen island, and braced myself. I always finish filing with a terrible taste in my mouth… and you can bet it’s not the protein shake. This year we got hit with an underpayment penalty. We hadn’t let Uncle Sam withhold as much as he needed, and he punished us for it. As much as I hate taxes, the experience wouldn’t be so bad if there were regular communications from the IRS throughout the year. I want to know in August if I’m on track to have my taxes paid in full. I want to have deductions top of mind so I remember to save documents and receipts. Here’s the point: Regular, substantive communication is key if you want to build a healthy brand. Nobody wants to be the IRS, but without communication, you increase your risk for leaving a bad taste in someone’s mouth.

We recognize and agree that the Holy Spirit is the only one who can draw people near, sway their hearts, and renew their minds. We know that he uses means to do that. What are those means? They are anything from a meal, to a sermon, to podcasts, to graphic design, which ultimately communicate his Word. In light of that, we should ask how can we do those things in a way that will glorify God and be used by his Holy Spirit? It’s not an easy question to answer, but a powerful place to start is in your church brand. You already have the substance in your vision, mission, and values… the challenge is to create something of the highest quality to capture that substance, visually representing what God is doing in your local body. This is what I challenge myself with every time I sit down at the drawing board.

Does your church ever put on conferences, take the youth to summer camp, or organize community gatherings? Churches who do this at a high level use communication strategies to make these events well-attended, memorable, and impactful. One of those strategies is to give the event its own visuals, but when is this the right call? I could give you a decision-making tree and a process to decide, but I figured a list of pros and cons would do just fine. This way you can go through the list and decide for yourself if each item applies to your situation. With that, here are the pros and cons of creating unique branding for your church event: Pros: Gives the event a distinct identity – Makes it feel special rather than just another church activity. Can boost engagement and attendance – A fresh look can generate curiosity and excitement. Helps with marketing and promotions – Unique branding makes it easier to design flyers, social media posts, and announcements that grab attention. Allows creative storytelling – You can tailor the visuals to match the event’s theme, making it more immersive and impactful. Can attract new people – A well-branded event may appeal to those outside your congregation who wouldn’t normally attend. Cons: Takes extra time and effort – Creating custom visuals means more planning and design work. Can dilute your main church brand – If done too often, people might associate more with the event than with the church itself. Inconsistent quality risks – If branding isn’t done well, it could look unprofessional or weaken the event’s perceived value. Might not always be necessary – Some events function just fine under the church’s existing branding, and adding unique visuals could be overkill. Pro tip Using your main church logo in a subtle, tasteful way on event graphics associates the event with your church. Making a connection to your parent brand is a way to remind attendees of the mission driving you to put the event on in the first place.

Marshall McLuhan was a Canadian communication theorist who coined the phrase, “The medium is the message.” In other words: how you choose to say something changes what your audience walks away with. McLuhan’s point was that each medium doesn’t just deliver your message - it shapes it and sends unspoken signals like: The value you place on the relationship How urgent or serious something is How you want to be perceived Let’s look at an example. Sending a text message says, “I want to be quick and efficient.” A phone call says, “This is personal.” The words exchanged can be the same, but the vibe of that medium changes what message actually gets received. Effective branding is effective communication, so it’s important to understand this idea! Here are a few church-specific examples: Animated sermon graphics say, “We care about looking fresh and young.” A church-wide email newsletter says, “We expect our members to stay informed.” Hand-written note cards from a pastor or staff member say, “You are known and cared for.” You have core ideas and feelings about your church that you want your congregation and community to “get.” The medium can either supercharge or neutralize the power of those ideas. If they’re not getting it, you might want to find a different way of presenting it.

In a church rebrand project, I tend to focus mainly on designing the congregation’s visual identity. However, there’s a key part of branding that doesn’t always get as much attention, which I’ve started including in the church brand guides I create. That piece is a verbal identity. A consistent writing style is crucial in church communications, and I’m breaking it down into its two fundamental parts today. If the content of your bulletin reads dramatically different from the content of your website, which reads different from your social media, then your overall message won’t land with the same impact. So, let’s look at the two key facets of a verbal identity: vocabulary and tone of voice. Brand Vocabulary The words you choose to use in official church creative work and communication should be a reflection of who you are speaking to, and how you want them to view you. Here’s an example of brand vocabulary guidelines: “In our church communications, we occasionally use words like ‘y’all’ and ‘fixin’ to identify with our main demographic of ranchers and homesteaders here in rural Oklahoma. These words should not be overused in a cliche way, but should be sprinkled in to add warmth and familiarity to our written copy.” In the next post, I’ll look at the other facet of a verbal identity: tone of voice.

In the last post, I looked at how vocabulary contributes to a cohesive verbal identity, and can be useful for a church trying to elevate their communications. Today, we’re on to the second part of a verbal identity: tone of voice. Now with AI tools, tone of voice guidelines are even more incredibly useful. Just ask this pastor I worked with on a recent rebrand. He was writing content for a connect card they could use to gather information from visitors, and he was blown away by how helpful it was to have a brand tone of voice. “Bro, ChatGPT is crazy cool… I put in the tone description from our brand guidelines, and it gave me all kinds of good options!” Here’s the tone description he was talking about: “Our tone is bold yet humble—serious about truth, passionate about people, and always inviting others into something real. We speak with clarity, conviction, and warmth, aiming to reflect both the reverence of our faith and the relational heart of our church.” If you saw a social media post with exclamation points, emoji’s and emotional word choice, you would probably expect a passionate, informal, and loud worship service on Sunday morning. Now, what if you showed up to that church and found a conservative Presbyterian church with organ-led hymns and a serious vibe. Would you be confused? Inconsistent writing style can even leave visitors with a subtle feeling of being confused or tricked, rather than edified. In the end, looking the part is critically important, but your visuals are ultimately just the vehicle for what can only be communicated through written (or spoken) words.